Oval Colored Lab Diamond Pear Halo Cluster Ring

The Halo Should Be Recorded as a Stone Map

FLGR-01 places a 1.05 carat Fancy Vivid Green cushion lab-grown diamond at the center of a mixed-shape rose-cut floral halo. The surrounding diamonds total approximately 1.35 carats, so the outside silhouette is created by the petal layout as much as by the certified center stone.

For a B2B order, "1.35 ct halo" is not a complete repeat-production instruction. Each petal has its own outline, direction and meeting point. The approved file should show where every pear, marquise or shield-like stone sits, which tip faces outward, and how the gaps are distributed around the cushion center.

Loose green center options can be compared in the green lab diamond collection. Once a center is selected, the halo should be rebuilt around its actual millimeter dimensions rather than copied from a nominal 1.05 carat template.

Petal Order Matters More Than Combined Carat Weight

1. Center orientation: record which cushion edge faces the bail and how the stone is aligned to the shank.
2. Petal sequence: number every surrounding stone clockwise so replacements return to the correct position.
3. Individual measurements: retain length, width and depth for each rose-cut stone, not only the 1.35 ct total.
4. Tip direction: note which pointed ends face outward and which curved edges meet the center.
5. Finished face width: approve the complete floral diameter because it controls finger coverage and pendant scale.

A replacement stone with the same weight can still alter the flower if its shoulder is broader, its point is longer or its depth changes the setting height. For this design, visual symmetry is controlled by a position-by-position map rather than an average side-stone specification.

Keep the Center Report Separate from the Finished Ring Record

IGI report LG713527999 identifies the center as a 1.05 ct Cushion Modified Brilliant laboratory-grown diamond measuring 6.93 x 5.46 x 3.62 mm. It is graded Fancy Vivid Green and VS1, with Excellent polish, Excellent symmetry and no fluorescence.

The report states that the stone was produced by the HPHT growth process and shows indications of post-growth treatment. These details apply to the inscribed center diamond. They do not grade the 1.35 ct floral halo, verify the 18K gold or certify the detachable ring-pendant structure.

Three Cost Adjustments Without Flattening the Flower

These options should be reviewed through custom colored diamond jewelry development. The comparison should show the measured face width and stone map for each version, not only a different total carat figure.

FLGR-01 Sample Reference

Product format

Detachable floral ring and pendant head

Center diamond

1.05 ct Fancy Vivid Green VS1 cushion lab-grown diamond

IGI report

LG713527999

Halo diamonds

Approximately 1.35 ct mixed-shape rose-cut lab-grown diamonds

Total diamond weight

Approximately 2.40 ct

Metal and sample weight

18K white gold; approximately 4.53 g

Sample ring size

Workshop size 13; other sizes by CAD review

Order support

MOQ 1 piece; initial CAD normally within 48 hours; production normally 7-12 working days after approval

QC Should Compare the Flower, Not Just the Sparkle

The front image should confirm that the cushion sits square to the ring axis and that no petal appears longer, lower or more crowded than its opposite position. The outline should remain balanced even though the surrounding stones use different shapes.

The side image should confirm even petal height, stable center prongs and sufficient clearance above the receiving ring base. Pendant mode should be checked separately so the bail carries the head vertically without pulling the floral face forward.

For repeat orders, retain the numbered stone map, individual halo measurements, finished face width, center report number, component interface record and approved front, side and pendant images.

Questions Specific to the Rose-Cut Petal Layout

Can the 1.35 ct halo be reordered by total weight?

No. The order should identify every petal by position, shape and measurements. Equal total weight cannot preserve the same floral outline.

Can one missing petal be replaced without rebuilding the halo?

It can be reviewed when the original stone map and measurements are available. The replacement must match the position, outline, depth and setting height before it is approved.

What changes when the cushion center becomes wider?

A wider center reduces the available inner gaps and may push the petal ring outward. The center seat, prong positions and finished face width should be recalculated together.

Request a numbered petal map for FLGR-01. Through the floral layout record request, ask for the clockwise stone sequence, individual measurements, finished face width and front-view QC reference. This gives your purchasing team a repeatable halo standard before pricing additional ring bases or pendant versions.